Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Næd Skräm's avatar

You seem to think that citizens assemblies are some form of anarchy. Ballot initiatives are not anarchy. Just because a proposal may originate with a group of citizens, it has nothing to do with law enforcement. Our agency is not given to us by the government, it is a natural right given by God to all people in the world. Whether a government recognizes it or not. Maybe you just don't understand constitutions? There have been hundreds of constitutional conventions in this country since our founding. Each state went through it for statehood, there were also reconstruction conventions, and completely voluntary moment when they wanted to update things. That is where we are on a national level. We need to assemble. Those conventions weren't filled with legislators, they are common people who went back to their normal jobs when it was over. That isn't a society without government or law enforcement, it is a society that defines who they are and their mission.

Expand full comment
Næd Skräm's avatar

What restraint? The words that are written as clearly as can be are suddenly ambiguous to the Supreme Court. Now people that are born in the United States are no longer citizens if our police force think so. The president ignores unanimous decisions by the Supreme Court. Which isn't so much a problem because they're enabling him to violate the constitution most of the time. Does Congress impeach when the Supreme Court or the president violates the Constitution? Not anymore. They already realized that that's a fruitless effort that doesn't work. Is George w bush said, the Constitution is just a piece of paper. That's how they treat it. A functional Constitution restrains the power of government whether they respected or not. When our law enforcement is sending citizens to foreign gulags without trial, I don't know how much less restrained they can be. How much do you want them to be allowed to do to you? If you can be sent to another country without trial, your life liberty and the pursuit of happiness is totally in their control. The president is violating posse comitatus, violating the 14th amendment, violating the sixth amendment, overreaching by dismantling agencies and defunding them when Congress appropriate but that funding, violating the 10th amendment marching troops into states without the cooperation of the governor. The list goes on and on I have no idea what universe you live in. We are not all equal before the law. Clearly some are above it. A lawless society quickly devolves just like Venezuela. They had Jack booted thugs kicking in doors and going door to door through high-rise apartment buildings at homes. They just funded ICE more than the Marines. What do you think that means is coming?

Clearly we need to refresh. We cannot allow the arcane language of this constitution to be misinterpreted by this Supreme Court and this president or future ones. The checks and balances that rest with the three branches of government do not work when all three branches are corrupt. The people need checks and balances that do not exist in this constitution, but do exist in state constitutions. We need the Democratic tools to clean up the corruption in our government. We need to restrain our government because our government is unwilling to abide by the Constitution. Giving the people the power to check politicians and basically just call shenanigans on the whole thing, it's obviously a contemporary need not a convenient desire. The more we decentralized power, the better of our country will be.

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts